The recent currency increase affected the rent, my roommate doesn't understand

Due to the recent currency increase, everything is already complicated in terms of general expenses. What about the approach to other costs? Is it only the rent that's a concern, or is there a similar attitude towards other things as well? Because if this is a general attitude, you need to consider more than just this month's rent.

This situation seems to violate an agreement that accepts sharing fixed costs. Was this increase discussed before the foreign currency? Or did the "the more there is, the less I am" mentality come up later? If there was a lack of trust, establish the rules in writing from the beginning, because by this point, no one can trust anyone's word.

I think the term "my payment" reflects not only individual conflict but also societal distrust. The rise in foreign exchange affects not just rent, but actually shakes the entire system. There is a system that shaves away, so it’s normal for someone to feel the urge to say "enough is enough" and get up from the table. But if that's happening, it should have drawn you into a discussion rather than just prompting you to get up from the table; that's the shortcoming here.

I agree that the statement "I won't pay" is not an individual one, but the real issue here is the refusal to share responsibility while speaking as if a decision has been made. The increase in currency is certainly a burden for everyone, but if you're living with someone, you have to bear the shared burden. If they say, "I won't pay," then why are they still around? Either you will sit down and renegotiate, or if necessary, you will go your separate ways. There's no other way out.

When they say "I can't pay," that actually signifies the end of your rental arrangement. If they are breaking the agreement you accepted, it's no longer just their personal protest, but also a situation where you are a victim. Have you thought about how their attitude affects you while trying to find the means to cover your own rent? Because after a certain point, it's not only a financial burden but also a psychological one. Is it worth it?

"I'm not paying" and still sitting at home, I have this in my mind: Is he saying this to you or to the landlord? I mean, does he see you as a spokesperson or something? Because in this situation, he should have shown his attitude directly to the landlord. If you are the one being addressed, what's the issue; why isn't he communicating directly? Maybe the real objection lies somewhere else.

If he says "I can't pay," I think it's beyond currency issues. Isn't the matter about sharing responsibility here? Yes, the currency has increased, everything is getting harder, but nothing in life is going to get easier. While you're struggling, why does he think he is exempt from struggling? That's what's bothering me.

From someone who says "I won't pay," if they have the intention to stay in that house, in my opinion, they should also come up with an alternative suggestion. For example, did they offer any other contribution that would alleviate your burden? Or are they just sitting silently? Because it's not just about the difficulty of the period; it's also a matter of intent.

If they say "I won't pay," have you clearly determined what you're going to do? I mean, how long is this deadlock going to last? Clearly, the other side is not backing down; will you say, "Okay, I'll pay my share too," or are you going to bring this situation to an end? Without discussing these things, this matter will just drag on.

We need to clarify, when you say "my payment," are you referring to the new rent or the total amount? Because if it's the total, that directly indicates a breakdown in the partnership. If you only mean the difference in the new amount, why are you placing that burden solely on you? They also have a responsibility for this increase; there should have been ground for negotiation here. First, understand whether this is just a reactive stance or an excuse for something else.

On the one hand, we need to think about this: how long is this "payment" decision valid in their mind? Is it a reaction to a temporary adjustment period, or are they thinking long-term? Is it a temporary setback or a complete withdrawal from the situation? It remains ambiguous without a clear timeframe.

When they said "I will not pay," what comes to my mind is: How did they react when the first rent increase news came? Was this a topic being discussed at that moment, or did they later say "I do not agree with this?" Because if they remained silent at first and then took this stance, they might not have made a plan. So what kind of refusal to pay is this, was it from the beginning or a new decision? It's important to know the starting point.

If they say "I can't pay," we need to discuss whether this is limited to just the rent. Do they exhibit the same attitude towards other shared expenses? Is the issue a general irresponsibility, or is it just a reaction specific to the rent increase? Without clarifying this, finding a solution is difficult. For example, what about the bills?

If someone saying "I can't pay" is giving a specific response to a rent increase, I think there's a fundamental contradiction if they still claim they want to continue living in that house. Let's say they couldn't balance things in the short term, then why aren't they proposing a long-term solution against this increase? It seems like they are accepting the increase as just an injustice that life is imposing on them and seeing it as normal for others to shoulder the burden. This mindset doesn't fit with being a housemate.

So, does this "my payment" statement stem from not realizing the weight of your legal responsibilities as a tenant? Because in the end, if the rent isn't paid, you're all in the same boat; the landlord doesn't care who paid what share, they look at the total debt. Have you ever talked about this?

The person saying "my payment" here knows that the apocalypse won't happen, meaning they might trust that you'll inevitably cover their share as well. If there's such comfort, they will continue to use you without having a serious conversation. For example, have you clearly stated in the account, "I can't cover this alone, if it's not paid, this is the result"?

I was also curious about this: okay, he says "my payment," but did he mention at all the possibility of leaving the house? I mean, is he seriously considering moving out completely, or is he just talking? Because if he's going to continue with this mindset, it will only give him more headaches.

This may have something to do with the bills, but since it has come down to a direct "payment" situation, either their financial situation has worsened significantly, or they are expecting an ultimatum from you. For example, when you explicitly asked, "What is the solution to this situation, to go or to stay?" did you get a clear answer? Because sometimes people choose not to calculate but to react.

I think the issue is this: Even if he says he won't pay, it creates a mindset of "I can keep living here but won't care about the rent" — how can he be so disconnected? Is there an issue affecting his life that he is not openly discussing and looking for a solution for, or does he believe that you won't raise your voice? I'm sensing a bit too much complacency.

Is the person saying "this payment" not finding the rent increase fair, or are they reacting this way solely because of their own financial situation? Because if there is an argument of "if I pay this, I will be wronged," then a solution can be discussed. However, if they are completely removing the burden from the shared responsibility due to personal deadlock, it may be necessary to reconsider the decision to continue living together.

The economic situation has worsened, sure, but are your resources limitless that you can bear the entire burden? I mean, if we're talking about rent, if there's the same indifference towards other expenses, I would have made sure to secure my footing from the start if I were in your position. For example, how did you react the moment he said "I won't pay"?

We experienced something similar in our house last year. I told my then-housemate, "You're saying you won't pay, but what's your solution? If we can't find common ground, we'll just leave the house." After listening to his excuses, I realized he was just reacting without any real plan. In your case, if the person saying "I won't pay" has no intention of leaving, I think their intention stems from knowing they will be directly blamed for it. If you accept this, they will repeat it.

If someone says "I won't pay" and doesn't have a serious exit strategy, this actually becomes a matter of power balance. Do you realize that how you respond will determine how this balance progresses? Because if you initially showed an attitude completely accepting this responsibility, it normalizes this comfort for the other party. Have you ever drawn a clear line, like saying, "If you’re not paying either, I won’t stay in this house"? Drawing a line sometimes means setting a boundary, not necessarily solving a problem.

So, is this person considering a temporary solution until they recover their financial situation, or are they just looking to completely escape? Because such a sharp "I won't pay" statement makes it seem like they have accepted to pass on their responsibility in the long run. If they're taking the same stance with other expenses, it doesn't seem like they are looking for a solution without discussing it.

"I'm not paying" they say, but was your overall expense-sharing arrangement healthy to begin with? If there have been similar imbalances in other expenses before this, the issue may not only be about the rent, but also about the roles not being clearly defined from the start. Were the boundaries you set clear from the beginning? Consider reflecting on this a bit.

If they're saying "I won't pay" and not thinking of leaving the house, they might also be testing you a bit. In other words, what are your boundaries, how much can you handle, how will you react? If you let them play with uncertainty now, it could drag on and result in your detriment. A clear solution plan is necessary; do you think you should let them come up with a solution proposal?

Have you ever played devil's advocate? Maybe instead of pressuring you by saying, "I won’t pay," they are trying to express internally, "I can no longer bear this burden," but they can't articulate it correctly. Ask clearly, "You say stay but you’re not paying, so how should we plan together in this situation?" Let's see if they are solution-oriented or if they are just looking out for their own interests.

Is the rent increase your roommate refers to as "payment" a one-time thing? Or will it be an ongoing burden? Because if it's a temporary situation, solidarity might make sense at some point, but if this increase is a long-term burden, they need to explain why you should cover their shortcomings. If they just say "payment" and don't offer a way out, I don't think you should be the one shouldering the burden.

If they aren't thinking about leaving the house, why are they saying "I won't pay"? If they're making such a clear statement, they're either expecting you to take on the solution by putting pressure on you or actually don't have any alternative to live elsewhere. I think before you start looking for solutions on their behalf, take a step and find out what this means to them. If they have an intention, they'll make it clear.

"I can't pay" he says, but where can he go in this economic situation? I mean, moving has become a cost on its own now. If he really doesn't have a Plan B to go to, this just seems like he's trying to buy time. I think you should sit down and directly ask, "So what are you doing then?" If he can't escape, it will become clear.

"I've got my payment," they said, but what about after saying that? Are they maintaining the same attitude towards electricity, water, and other expenses? Or is it just the rent that's the issue? If they're still sharing the other costs, then maybe they really are in a tight spot financially but aren’t trying to escape completely. If it's all on you and they're just thinking, "let's not equalize the burden," then their intentions are pretty muddled. Solutions can't be sought without understanding this.

Think about this too: was it just the rent that was hit by the increase in foreign exchange rates? I mean, is the salary no longer enough, does he have other debts, what has changed in his regular expenses? Maybe this "payment" issue is not just specific to the rent, but rather an indicator of a larger general tightening. It's hard to make plans without seeing that part.

He might not have enough salary or could be experiencing economic difficulties, fine, but why should the solution to this situation fall on you to handle it "alone"? If he can't pay, let's cut back on another expense, change the division of labor at home, or he can suggest something else. He can't just sit back and say "I won't pay" without sharing any responsibility; it doesn't work that way.

So how sustainable is this "paying" attitude? I mean, they might be financially constrained right now, but what’s the plan for the future? Even if they are expecting temporary support, they need to set a limit and a turnaround plan; you can’t keep imposing restrictions indefinitely. I think you should ask for a clear timeline and commitment, then it will become apparent.

"I'm not paying," he says, but on the other hand, is he still comfortably using other areas of the house? For instance, what is he doing in the kitchen, is he contributing to shopping, is he still being cooperative in the common areas? Or does he think that by saying "I'm not paying" he can completely evade responsibility and quietly offload it onto you? It seems like a boundary needs to be set from the start.

If your roommate said "I'll pay," I think the real issue is at what point they said "I'll pay." In other words, was this a rental share that was discussed from the very beginning, or did the problem arise when they saw the total amount you had to cover? If there's intention to settle up later, then this part is important.

After saying "I won't pay it," did they suggest anything for the search for a solution? Because the interesting part of the matter is both making such a statement and not offering an alternative route. If there’s no plan, it just appears to be an imposition. That silence is significant.

One who says "I can't pay" should be examined for how much they are internalizing that statement. For example, are they continuing to spend their income in other areas while not paying rent, or are they genuinely stuck? Because if it's a matter of personal preference, then achieving balance is impossible there. Progress cannot be made without clarifying this.

Do you clearly know where you're spending your own income? I mean, if they're being straightforward and showing you their plan, that's one thing, but if there's no transparency about their spending habits, the phrase "I'll pay" just hangs in the air. It's not possible to chart a course without seeing where they're stuck.

If they say "I can't pay," there's also this: During this crisis, how much communication did they have with you, how open were they? For example, did they tell you two days before the rent due date, or did they notify you in advance? Because if they leave it until the last minute, that tends to show a bit of bad faith.

"I can’t pay" they say, but does that mean they’re saying, "this is my share" and leaving just the missing part, or are they completely out? Because the difference is significant. If it's just missing, maybe it can be managed with temporary solutions, but if they’ve completely withdrawn, you’re already carrying the load for two, and that’s not sustainable. Clarify the magnitude of the situation a bit.

"I can't pay" he said, but he keeps staying, right? In this case, I think the real question is: Does he really want to leave? Because, let's be clear, it seems like he's just offloading rather than finding a solution. So either a serious conversation is needed, or it means the plans for separation have already begun.

She said "payment", so did you offer her a suggestion like "then how will it be resolved"? Because sometimes people wait for the other party to take a step, unable to express their own tight situation and just cutting it off like that. Maybe your coming up with a suggestion could solve things; from the inside, this silence just keeps growing.

If he says "I won't pay" and continues to stay in this situation, we really need to look at the matter from another perspective: Could this person think that the household revolves around them and believe they can get away with it? In other words, the moment they say this, it seems like they are assuming they will somehow manage. If that's the case, it means they haven't even considered the logic of moving out. The comfort in that situation is significant.

If they say "I won't pay," how do you explain this situation to the landlord? Because even while your roommate is having a crisis, you still have a collective responsibility to the outside. If this gets complicated, the landlord can also target you. Have you thought about that?

How long has it been since you said "I owe you"? Because as time goes on in this matter, things become more complicated. What was initially tolerated as "temporary" ends up being perceived as permanent, making it harder to revert. Has the connection completely broken there?

What do you think they are actually relying on by saying "I won't pay"? Because even if someone is in a tight spot, if they dare to remain completely payment-free, they either have a backup plan or they think you will give in to this. Could it be that they are leaving an open door? In other words, could this attitude be more of a test rather than an outright pressure?

I think the critical part of the situation is, after saying "I won't pay," what is this person's attitude towards other expenses? Are they still managing grocery shopping or bills, or have they completely withdrawn? Because sometimes people completely let go of one item and continue with others, which at least leaves room for a temporary solution. If they have completely distanced themselves, then it seems like you need to pause and set a boundary.

"I can’t pay" they say, but you haven’t set a clear boundary either. For example, did you say clearly, "We can’t continue like this; either you contribute this much or you move out"? Because this situation has turned into a bit of an Ajda Pekkan song: "Don’t go, please don’t go!" but on the other hand, you’re carrying a load. A firm stance is needed.

After saying "I can't pay it", is he really in such a difficult situation that he can't do it, or is he acting this way despite being able to? Because if it's entirely a matter of financial helplessness, you may need to come up with a temporary plan together for a solution. But if this is just to shirk responsibility, then you should seriously consider severing ties. What do you think?

"He says 'I'm not paying,' but still continues to stay at home, which is interesting. If he has no intention of moving out directly, it seems like he's chosen this route to somehow force you. But here's another thing: are you covering the expenses during this process? Because if this situation drags on and you start making the payments alone, what if you say 'I'm not paying either'? How would things shape up then? Would he really feel like he had to move somewhere, or would he still expect a solution from you?

Is there a guarantee for this: Is it possible that this person already wants to move but aims to stay a few months without rent? So the issue isn't being unable to pay, but rather them seeing you as some sort of "free accommodation" option? Because if that's the intention, then no other solution suggestion will work.

Have you thought about the "Can they afford to move?" part? Because sometimes people might not resist paying rent, but they avoid the costs of moving and the deposit. You know, if starting over somewhere else feels heavier than their current situation, could they choose to resist just for that reason? A bit of strategic reading is needed here.

If they can still sit at home saying "I can't pay," it seems like you've shown a bit too much tolerance. Didn't you sit down and set a date? Without clarifying something like "We'll either resolve this by this date or we'll part ways," this matter will keep dragging on. The moving costs can be an excuse, but it can't go on like this indefinitely.

After saying "I can't pay," even if you set a clear deadline, can that person arrange something else by that date? Because not only their financial strength matters, but also how much support they can get from their surroundings is important. For instance, if they prefer to stubbornly confront you instead of leaving, they might really feel trapped in this situation but don't want to admit it. It’s strange that the entire situation is based on not communicating; did you ask for a clear explanation?

Is there a direct link between the rent and the currency, or did the landlord seize the opportunity to raise the price? Because this detail is important. If the rent increase is not aligned with reality, it’s necessary to understand if your roommate sees this as an excuse as well.

Your roommate might not realize it, but your flexibility could have made the situation seem "manageable" in their eyes. Have you tried focusing directly on "whether this place is sustainable" instead of discussing the currency, price increases, and all the conditions? Because at the root of the issue, there seems to be a question as significant as price increases: "Does it make sense to continue staying here?"

What’s just as important as whether they can afford to move is whether they would prefer to move. Some people won’t budge no matter how bad the circumstances are, just because they don’t want their established routine disrupted. You need to understand if they think, "This place is bad, but the outside world is even worse."

I'm putting aside whether or not to prefer moving, but let's clarify this: Is this person relying on other expenses because they're not paying rent, or are they not contributing to anything at all? Because if it's the latter, I think that's more about taking advantage than "not being able to afford it." I believe this side of the issue has not been discussed at all.

Forget about burdening with expenses, does it offer criticism or suggestions for a solution? Because sometimes there is a gap between someone who wants to progress by saying, "I can't pay, but let's do this," and someone who completely falls silent and stops looking for a solution for you. In the second case, it really turns into a matter of intent.

Does he really think he can maintain this situation indefinitely with a "You'll manage me" mentality? I mean, instead of agreeing on a solution because he can't pay, is he trying to force you to take on everything on your shoulders? Because sometimes people can fully accept that someone else will carry the burden and stop trying to find a solution.

Your roommate being this laid-back might indicate not only your lack of boundary-setting but also their desperation or indifference. But I'm curious, while we talk about currency increases and such, is there any document, any written proof regarding the rise in rent? Or is it just talk going around? Because if there's nothing official, maybe the landlord is exaggerating or just looking for an opportunity.

Before discussing the rent increase with your roommate, did you clarify with the landlord whether this currency is being used as an excuse? Because if there isn’t a legitimate increase, your friend may be using this as a way to evade their responsibility. In this case, it wouldn’t be about the currency at all, but rather entirely about their stance.

How well does your friend grasp this wage issue? For example, do you sit down and calculate currency, rent increases, and finances together? Or do they just step back and say, "it doesn't work for me"? Because sometimes people tend to disregard things when they lack complete information, and it all falls on someone else.

If your roommate doesn't share the same concerns about cash flow as you do, issues of increases may come across as abstract to them. Are they keeping their own expenses at the same level, or is there some kind of evaluation or cuts happening there? Because someone who doesn't make sacrifices for another person will likely disregard shared expenses.

If there is a document regarding the increase in rent and the raise is confirmed, I think you should present this new amount clearly to your friend and ask, "Do you have a plan to accommodate this?" If they are still responding with excuses or silence, it means there is no effort to sit down and seek a solution together. Also, I wonder this: even if they can't pay the rent, are they offering to contribute in some other way to manage this period, or do they think you will carry everything on your own?

It’s nice to say, "Do you have a plan for that?" but a plan should be somewhat mutual. Let’s say you clarified the numbers with your roommate, but has there ever been a time when they said to you, "I can take on this during the process, we can solve it like this"? Or is their version of a plan just a vague, "We’ll manage somehow"? Because if they are constantly expecting you to come up with solutions, then that’s not a plan; it’s passing the burden.

There's all this talk about how much prices are going up, but for example, where is this person cutting back on their own expenses, and how are they balancing other things? Is there any order in their budgeting? Because if someone who can't pay their rent is still ordering takeout or continuing with unnecessary expenses, then this is really more about enjoyment than intention. At that point, even the laundry's water won't hold.

The discussion about whether the rent increase is just an excuse for currency issues actually boils down to how much of that burden you can carry. By accepting this increase and trying to pay it, if he doesn't make any adjustments to his own budget, it will cause you trouble not just this month but every month afterward. That’s why right now, you need to clarify not with him a "temporary fix," but rather the question of "how will this work in the long term?" Will he find a solution regarding the unpaid rent by a certain date, or will you continue with an ineffective arrangement?

Whether we find the rent increase justified or not, let's assume that it is and that this is the new figure. So, is your friend unable to pay completely, or can they pay partially? Because if they can pay partially, you could temporarily cover the difference and ask them to balance it out over a period of time. Do they not have any steps to resolve this situation?

Is your friend showing any resistance to this rent increase, or do they really not have the financial means? Because even if they have the means, they might justify their position by finding the increase "unnecessary" or "exaggerated." So, it might not just be about money; it could also be about how they approach this situation. Have you ever discussed the scenario of "what would we do if we moved out of this place" together? Maybe starting from there could help clarify financial boundaries.

I don't know if the moving scenario has been discussed, but the main issue is this: Did your friend ever come up with a suggestion like "it would be more suitable if we moved to another house"? Or are they making a strategy to stay in the house and reduce the burden of sharing? Because if there are financial constraints, people tend to think solution-oriented; if they aren't budging at all, they're probably expecting you to carry the entire load.

In this case, you should directly ask your friend, "We're struggling to manage this house now, do you have another option?" If you are not hearing any concrete suggestions, it means you likely don’t have the energy to look for solutions anymore. But there’s also the possibility that they don’t have a steady income to completely resolve the issue and can’t explain that to you. Sometimes, when people are genuinely desperate, they may seem to give up. Nudge them a bit to clarify.

People keep saying to a friend, "Do you have another option?" But what if you are actually the only option? I mean, when you talk about moving or whatever, can they say, "Okay, if you're leaving, then go" or "I can't do this with you"? Or is what they don't want already not a solution?

My main question is this: Is your friend not taking this situation seriously, or do they have the ease of thinking "there will surely be a way out"? Because these are two different things. The first is a lack of responsibility, while the second is completely relying on you and leaning on you. Without distinguishing between the two, you won’t be able to find a clear solution.

All these analyses are nice, but do you really know your friend's financial situation? Maybe they genuinely think, "I can't live anywhere else for this money" and aren't even considering the idea of moving. Or perhaps they've reached a state where they think nothing could be worse. Are they acting as if you're all looking for a way out together, or are they quietly putting it all on you?

Even if you know your friend's income, you might not know their spending priorities. Maybe they have luxury expenses apart from rent and aren't considering cutting them, which can make it look like "they have income but don’t want to." Have you ever asked in detail, "What’s your spending plan?" Because sometimes the issue really relates to how they use their budget.

Well, what difference does it make if you know the spending plan? If the guy is already in the mindset of "I don't want to give money here," even if he spills out the money from under his pillow, the outcome won't change. First, clarify what his real goal is. Is it genuinely a budget issue, or does he find the rent unnecessary and wants to push you out slowly? That's unclear.

So why are you thinking about this rent all by yourself? Let's say they can't solve that budget issue, aren't sharing with you, or are refusing to move. But at some point, you should have asked this: *what do they want* out of this? Because if they're continuing without coming up with a solution together, whether to stay or go is entirely up to your determination.

Has anything like this ever been discussed: a clear ultimatum like "If we can't find a solution together, I'm out, and you can manage the house however you see fit"? Because right now, everyone is trying to think in his place, but maybe you are the only one who can afford the luxury of not producing any solution. If the boundary isn't clear, people are just guessing.

You're watching this house burning down with the innocence of "it can be solved in any way," just like in Istanbul: Under My Wings, but clearly your friend has no plan for a wing. Don't you have to say this openly: "What are you thinking of doing from this point onward? Because I need to know whether you'll continue with me or without me." So either put on a Sezen album and talk dramatically, or play your cards openly, otherwise this story will end up as Bitter Coffee.

Have you ever asked something like, "If I leave, how will you pay this rent?" Because sometimes people are so sure that the current arrangement in their lives won’t fall apart that they don’t confront a real alternative. If a clear answer like "I can't pay" comes back, your threat of separation might actually just be an empty stick.

But isn't it important how serious you are when you make these statements that seem like a rest or a threat? I mean, if you can really say "I will leave," then it's fine, and you can put alternatives on the table. But if you're just saying it to make sure "they take me seriously," there's a chance they might perceive it as a game and completely disregard it. Are you clear about this?

Maybe the issue isn't "rent," but rather the desire to continue sharing the same house with you. If the moment this is over the friendship will also end, they might just be going through the motions to maintain the routine. Why not directly ask, "Do you want to continue this partnership, rather than just this house?"

Maybe your friend is afraid of the moving idea but can't say it directly. A new house, a new setup, maybe a different roommate... Is that scaring them? I mean, maybe it's not just about rent, but completely about trying to preserve their comfort zone.

We can't excuse everything just by talking about comfort zones, but at some point, we need to say, "it's your responsibility to deal with those fears." If the guy is not willing to move and is putting you in a tough spot because of it, that's passive resistance. You can also set a deadline and say, "if you don't find a solution within this time, I'll impose the solution." Not every fear requires validation; some should be stepped over.

If after all these ideas there's still no solution, I think you can clarify the situation by saying to your friend, "If you're not considering moving, I will move and find a house that fits my budget." This way, you show them your alternative, and it becomes clear who is doing what from now on.

Your friend is stuck with the rent, but maybe there's a general deficit in their income-expense situation, which is why they can't come up with a solution. For instance, has he shared what else he's spending on? If the main hole in his pocket isn't the rent, no matter how much you push back, things won't improve. Have you fully questioned his earnings?

Maybe the issue isn't just the budget, but also the habit. This home smells like an Ezginin Günlüğü song, beautiful in the past but now rotting. They might have become so accustomed to comfort that they can't even see the need for change. It's worth asking: Can we really live forever in this arrangement? Or will everyone just be left to amuse themselves if one of us doesn’t close this chapter?

Setting up a regular arrangement with a roommate is challenging enough, but when money gets involved, it becomes even more complicated. But for example, what if you offered to take on the rent increase instead, and then asked them to balance it out in another way? Rather than directly saying, "I'm moving out," it could be about finding a solution with a different division of responsibilities. Wouldn't this mean both of you are taking on some responsibility?

Alright, but if you take on the entire burden of the rent, doesn’t that leave the balancing act hanging? I think we need to discuss the division of labor outside the budget with the friend. For example, what about unfinished tasks or responsibilities at home? Is there equality in that aspect? This rent issue might just be the visible part of the iceberg.

Maybe your friend thinks they're managing things. They could have set up a system where they say, "We'll handle it, let's not think about it now," while actually not doing their part. If they're in this mindset regarding rent, household chores, or the relationship, it seems you're always the one making sacrifices. This will accumulate. Take a moment to stop and let them do something for a change. Let's see if they really take the idea of moving seriously.

What if your friend is really embarrassed to say that their financial situation is bad? You know, like you pretend to air your laundry but actually you're too lazy to dry it, something like that. You've questioned their income, but I think nothing can be clear without looking at their expenses one by one. You need to gather the actual moisture from where it goes.

Your friend might not understand the seriousness of this currency-rent issue, because they've never been in such a tight spot before. In other words, some people tend to think someone else's financial crisis is an "exaggeration" until they experience their own. Just ask directly: "How much time do we have in this system?" Maybe then they will start to consider the consequences.

So, if you continue to stay in this house, can you establish a balance in other expenses besides the rent? For example, grocery shopping, bills, etc. Maybe you can manage to improve the shared budget by increasing his burden in other expenses. Or is this just a matter of the rent?

So is this friend's inability to pay rent really the issue, or is it because they expect you to carry the burden? In other words, if they're saying "I have no money" but spending a lot on other things, then you might need to question their intentions. Otherwise, did you send the wrong signals? If you've always been accommodating until now, changing this dynamic will become difficult.

There's also this: if a friend doesn't understand the importance of the issue or doesn't want to understand, maybe you need to explain it in a way they'll grasp, rather than directly through currency, rent, etc. For example, create a "How much are we spending, where is it going?" list together. That's when they can see for themselves, and maybe they will realize the comfort they've gotten lost in. But if it stays vague like this, everyone will act as if they're right from their own perspective.

And there's this too, have you considered other possibilities while discussing the rent situation? For instance, moving to a smaller place or relocating. Maybe you can't handle this setup, but your friend is still clinging to it out of habit. It's necessary to move away from the idea of an untouchable home; perhaps a more balanced life is possible somewhere else.

You said friend, in a kind of "we'll manage, we’ll handle it" mode, but have you stepped out of this mode and set a clear boundary? I mean, saying, "I’m giving this much, I can’t give more." Maybe they relied too much on your flexibility, and without seeing a serious line, they didn’t pull back. Did you need to make it clear?

Your friend says "we'll take care of it," but the real question is: what plan do they have in mind while saying that? Or is it just a complete delay tactic? Without clarifying this, you won't get very far with the idea of moving or budgeting. Just ask directly how many more months you'll waste with these "we'll definitely figure it out" vibes.