The recent currency increase affected the rent, my roommate doesn't understand

So, how does he behave in other matters? For instance, when he needs to solve something related to his own work, does he show interest, or does he use excuses like "I don't understand" there as well? Because if he takes a different attitude when it touches on his personal interests, then it seems like there is not a division of labor, but rather an issue of shirking work.

What does he do when he keeps saying "I don't understand" and steps back, and then after some time, when the situation escalates? For instance, if you really need to move out because of a rent increase, does he still stay in the "I don't understand" mode, or does he take some action when things get serious? Do the consequences of the situation ever pressure him, or does he always find relief by having you solve it?

Let me play the devil's advocate: Maybe they don't interfere specifically because you solve things very well? Because in such situations, when one person consistently handles the tasks, it seems like the other one doesn't have too much responsibility. Have you ever tried saying, "I don't understand, but you explain it" and used a method to teach them the process as well? Maybe instead of confusion when left in the middle, there could be sharing.

But there could also be a situation like this: Maybe they really don't understand, and when you explain, they're afraid of feeling even more stupid with incomplete information and pull back. You know how sometimes a person completely avoids the issue instead of solving it, saying, "Oh, I just can't do it anyway." Do they openly admit this, or do they just say, "I don't understand" and brush it off?

If they say "I don't understand" and run away, that's already a problem. What I'm stuck on is this: It's understandable not to understand, but don't they ever wonder? I mean, how does the process work, at what point are decisions made... Not wanting to learn these things is a bit strange, isn't it? Or do they completely trust you, that's one possibility too.

Maybe after saying "I don't understand," they could be testing how you will react? In other words, upon seeing that you took action to resolve the issue, they might switch to "oh okay, let's continue like this" mode. As you keep finding solutions, you might be unknowingly supporting this cycle. Have you ever completely stepped back and thought, "well then, you handle it" and just observed?

So many people are focused on the excuse of "I don’t understand," but to me, something else seems to be missing: Does this person really notice that the rent has increased? I mean, while they say "I don’t understand," they might be completely dismissing the issue instead of taking it seriously. Have you ever shown a clear calculation like, "Look, we’re paying this much, it’s going to be this much"? Maybe their mind is elsewhere.

And there's this too: is there a structure that drags things out until it's too late, using the excuse of "I don't understand," and then ends up blaming you or the situation? I mean, right at the last moment does someone throw the ball back at you with a line like, "You didn't explain it to me properly, how could I have known?" These kinds of mindsets can be a bit dangerous.

I have a question: Does he ever come up with his own solutions in the parts where he says "I don't understand"? I mean, does he suggest something like "I can't do it, but we could consult a friend," or does everything just get stuck and is it completely left to you? Sometimes it's not just about not understanding; it completely shifts the responsibility away.

Doesn't he ever wonder where things will go after saying "I don't understand"? I mean, shouldn't he at least be asking questions like "How much will this rent increase affect us, what alternatives might there be, what path should we take?" Does the whole process seem like a mystery to him, or does he give up before you even start explaining? It's not normal to retreat this much.

But doesn't the possibility of having to leave the house at all concern this person rather than just a direct rent increase? I mean, it's one thing to say "I don't understand," but is there really no reaction against obvious results? It's strange.

Or could it be something like this: They might actually be more focused on how you will manage this rather than the rent increase itself. In other words, they're not saying "I don't understand," but rather it's more of a vibe like "you'll figure it out." You see, sometimes people think they can control others through passivity. Could this be the mindset of "well, they'll handle it anyway"?

Perhaps this "I don’t understand" phrase serves as a sort of shield, meaning it deliberately leaves things vague to completely shrug off responsibility. You can really tell if there’s something they don’t understand by this: Bring up another topic, something completely unrelated but complex. If they can engage in detail with, say, financial issues, then their state of "not understanding" is a bit of a lie. So try to see "where they don’t understand." If there's a general disconnect, that's one thing; if it's a selective situation, that's another. Solve this first.

The "I don’t understand" part is being focused on, but the real question is: Could this person be positioning themselves based on your reaction? For example, does it matter to them how much worse the situation could get if you don't approach it in a solution-oriented way? Sometimes, it can be more about testing the other person's boundaries than the issue at hand. Let's see what they will do when things really become unsolvable.

When they say "I don’t understand" and completely withdraw even from the simplest solution to this issue, it may not be possible to force this person seriously into anything. In other words, if they don’t take action even when you say, "there's a rent increase, let’s talk," how will you find a common path for bigger decisions in the future? You can get used to acting with confidence because some people handle problem-solving by passing it on to the other side.

Perhaps there is a general procrastinating attitude here rather than just what he means by "I don't understand." For example, have you suggested creating a concrete timeline for this rental issue? Conveying a sense of urgency, like "We need to make a plan by this date," can sometimes prompt someone to take action. So, he might not be inclined to resolve the situation without feeling a sense of responsibility.

When someone says "I don't understand," they might actually mean "don't get me involved in this stuff." Just ask directly: "What do you think you want to do to solve this matter?" Their reaction might reveal their intentions, because even a person who genuinely doesn't understand would try to suggest something for a solution. If they're not suggesting anything, it smells of passive resistance.

I think the main issue is this: This person might be in a comfort zone like "not wanting to understand." Because when they try to understand, they will have to take responsibility. But what I need to ask is this: Have you ever been together in such a financial decision-making process before? Or do they behave this way in every critical situation? Maybe this is a way they always use to escape.

You mentioned the currency increase; could this person's general perception of money be something like "rent goes up, but salaries will rise too somehow"? Some people have this illusion that "the system will somehow straighten itself out at some point," which is why they don't focus on it. Have you ever talked about it from this perspective?

"I don't understand," he says, but is your workload balanced with his now? I mean, aside from the increase in rent, we need to look at the distribution of responsibilities in the house. Maybe he is contributing so little right now that he doesn't even need to "understand" it, and that's why he doesn't care. For example, are your contributions to each other consistent outside of the rent? Or is there already an unequal arrangement? Because, like moving up a class, shifting one's own responsibilities to someone else is also a luxury.

As I understand it, this person doesn’t really like taking responsibility but enjoys living with you. I was curious about something: does this "I don’t understand" issue come up in other areas, like the electricity bill, cleaning duties, etc.? Or is it just in money matters that there’s this much "ignorance"? Because then it wouldn’t just be about the rent, but a general attitude of "I’ll do what suits me, and leave the rest".

"You're just stalling with 'I don't understand', but the real question is: If this person really wanted to 'understand', what would they do in the end? Would they come up with a budget plan, or would they just say 'okay' and hand everything over to you again? Let's say they forced themselves to pay their share, can you live with this mindset in the long run? That's the main issue; it's not just about the rent cap, it's about the person's attitude being fixed.

I found that strange, you say the currency has affected things, but this person's job/income situation has never been discussed. Perhaps their income is fixed and not increasing, which is why they are unresponsive. For example, are they currently in a position to provide a productive answer to the question, " rent has increased, how will we manage?" It might not just be simple misunderstanding, but a complete feeling of being cornered.

The income situation hasn't been discussed, but we need to learn about certain things on the expense side as well. For instance, is this person considering cutting their spending? Or will everything be passed on to you as is? Because sometimes beneath "I don't understand" lies a comfort of "don't touch my spending."

Could they interpret only what suits them? For example, you're not saying that the currency affects the rent, but rather stating, "the rent increased because of the currency." Then what reaction follows? Because sometimes the issue isn't really about "not understanding," but rather avoiding responsibility with wordplay.

"I don’t understand," they say, but I think the critical point is this: You discuss the impact of currency fluctuations, the increase in expenses, and so on, but did you clearly express that you're expecting a solution from this person? I mean, rather than saying, "The rent has increased, what are we going to do?" did you have a direct solution-focused conversation where you asked, "What will your contribution be, do you have a plan?" Sometimes people assume that nothing is expected of them behind the excuse of "I don’t understand."

"I don't understand" may be an excuse, but what if they really don't understand? Not everyone has the same financial literacy. It's important to explain simply how the exchange rate impacts rent, and then think from their perspective. For example, if you asked, "How does this increase affect you?" what would they say? Maybe they got stuck at another point.

Well, that's fine, but isn't it strange that you're doing such a detailed analysis with someone who just says "I don't understand"? The guy has already checked out, and you're still in a position of "if I explain, will he understand?" Maybe he doesn't need to understand; he needs to figure out how to pay his share. Stop carrying his weight.

You've gone around the phrase "I don't understand" quite a bit, but let me ask something more concrete: What happens when this person doesn't pay their share? Is the rent delayed, are you covering it, or is there some other arrangement? Because in the end, if the financial responsibility is left hanging, it's not a matter of "understanding," it's a matter of "payment."

Maybe saying "I don't understand" is a way of forcing you to explain continuously and trying to buy time. Have you ever tried throwing the ball back to them and asking, "Okay, if you don't understand, what solution do you suggest?" Let's see what they say then.

If someone says "I don't understand" and then leaves the responsibility for finding a solution to you, it becomes a bit of an unbalanced division of labor. Do you think there’s really an 'inability to understand' here, or is it more like a defense mechanism of 'not letting it be known that they understand'? Because even if they don't understand, trying to take responsibility for resolving the issue should be an instinct; it feels like it's entirely up to you.

Rather than producing a solution, they might be distracting you by saying they don’t understand. But there’s also the fact that if this "I don't understand" situation creates a repetitive cycle of explaining the same thing, perhaps you should stop explaining and wait for them to come up with a solution themselves. Because sometimes, trying to remain silent can be more effective than explaining.

"I don't understand," she says, but do you think this could just be a tactic to avoid talking about the rent? I mean, look at it from another angle: How does this person's approach to overall expenses and money management look? Maybe the issue is not just with the currency or the rent increase, but rather with her relationship to money in general.

Are you constantly the one coming up with solutions because he keeps saying "I don't understand"? Because in this state, there might not be any room for him to generate solutions. Maybe reminding him directly, "There is an increase, we are sharing it this way, where are you?" would clarify responsibility beyond just a solution.

This "I don't understand" issue is fine up to a point, but if the increase in rent is pushing your limits too, why are you going into so much detail? Even if he doesn't understand, it's clear that his share needs to increase. Just say, "This is how much it is, you need to pay this much," and the rest is his problem. How much can you explain?

Maybe they always keep you in a speaking position by saying "I don't understand"? So it could be more about strategy than communication. But the real question is: Are they really struggling to pay, or is it just not convenient for them? Because these two require completely different approaches.

If you think that saying "I don't understand" is prolonging the topic, does he accept that you are offering solutions during these conversations? So if he isn't listening as much as he doesn't understand, that's a problem. Would it be useful to just focus on the payment date and not get into anything else? Because that would also reduce the time you spend with him.

Maybe saying "I don't understand" is forcing you to explain, but it's delaying the solution by dragging the issue out over time. In other words, could their intention here be to keep you in this meaningless loop instead of making a payment? Because even if they truly don't understand, they should be asking "how can we solve this?", but it feels like they're just cornering you.

One question: Does this person also say "I don’t understand" regarding other responsibilities besides the rent, thus neglecting their duties? In general, the logic is this: If this behavior is limited only to the increase in rent, they might be using the currency as an excuse; but if they have this kind of attitude toward everything, the issue is not the currency but their mindset. This needs to be clarified.

"I don't understand," does what they say really mean an inability to grasp the currency-rent relationship, or is it an inability to accept the increase in payment rates? I think you should have a conversation that directly brings this to light. Have you tried saying, "Okay, if you don't understand, what do you not understand?" and asking for details? Because sometimes you learn the real issue in a roundabout way.

Have you ever thought about stopping to explain at the point where he said, "I don't understand"? Sometimes people stay in a mode of not understanding just to keep the conversation going. If you remain silent for a while, does the real issue come out? I would say it’s worth checking.

If they insist "I don’t understand," here's another possibility: Do they actually have a budget that they can handle for the new rent? In other words, it may not be explicitly stated, but perhaps they are choosing this instead of saying "I can’t make the payment." It’s somewhat of an avoidance tactic, but it won't be resolved without a clear check.

If they are really in a position where they can't pay, they might be choosing to buy time by saying 'I don't understand' instead of being straightforward about it. But then it also means they have no intention of sharing the responsibility. You don't have to bear this burden alone; think about why you are still together under these conditions.

It seems excessive to make so much explanation and even be patient with someone who says, "I don’t understand," but it also occurs to me: Could it be that he’s waiting for you to get angry and prolong the issue, in other words, does he want you to ultimately give in and accept the escalation? Do you think that’s too far-fetched of a possibility?

Bro, was there a clear agreement about the division of responsibilities between you guys from the start? I mean, even if this rent increase hadn't happened, if you've had a "we'll handle it" kind of attitude before, could it be that their current "I don't understand" response is a bit encouraged by your past behavior?

This might be an inappropriate question, but what are this person's overall spending habits like? In other words, are they generous when it comes to spending on things outside of rent, or do they seem to struggle with everything financially? Because the thing they said "I don't understand" could also stem from a lack of financial management skills. If that's the case, then if this isn't the first rent increase, why haven't similar issues arisen before? That's something to think about as well.

There’s also this aspect to it: Could they be trying to blame you passive-aggressively by saying, "I don’t understand"? You know, the underlying message being, "Why are you causing so many problems, look, I’m not worried about this". Because some people choose to escape conflict and impose guilt instead. If that’s the case, it’s time for a clear ultimatum.

"If you're arguing with someone who says, 'I don't understand,' I think sometimes you need to pay attention not just to the words but to the actions. For instance, when the rent is due, are they really not paying? Or do they somehow come around at the last minute? Because sometimes what stubbornly gets argued through words reveals itself through actions.

We're talking about the "I don't understand" part, but there might be another possibility: Maybe he doesn't understand what currency-rent really is at all. Is there really a fundamental lack of knowledge? Because this level of resistance is a bit strange. If that's the case, have you tried to illustrate and explain it with a few examples?

If you really have no idea about currency, or if you're just in a "don't explain it to me, just handle it" mode, then the latter is a different story altogether. I suggest you don’t proceed without figuring out which one it is.

So, if they say "I don't understand," what attitude do they display towards other common expenses outside of rent? I mean, do they have the same mindset regarding things like grocery shopping and electricity? Or is this "I don't understand" mode only activated for big and troublesome items? Because sometimes the issue isn't currency, but simply avoiding stepping out of their comfort zone.

So you're paying your share except for the rent increase, but when it comes to your part, you come out with this "I don't understand" response? Because this seems a bit like a tactic of not understanding what suits your interests, rather than just a lack of information.

Perhaps they really don't realize how effective the rent increase is, because their salary or income level is completely different from yours. So, while the increase may be a burden for you, it might not make much difference for them. In this case, you need to make the matter completely tangible and show, item by item, how much of a difference it makes.

If this person has not caused any issues during previous rent payment periods, they may be questioning whether the burden brought by the currency increase is fair. In other words, they might be reasoning, "Why are we, as tenants, bearing this? Isn’t the landlord affected at all by this situation?" Have they expressed this clearly?

Has he gone to the landlord and suggested looking for a joint solution directly? Like, "This increase is a bit excessive, can we find a middle ground?" Maybe when he says "I don't understand," he actually wants to steer the solution in another direction.

Did you clarify whether someone who says "I don't understand" is referring not just to the currency but to the general economic situation? For instance, they might be experiencing a broader confusion like, "everything has gotten more expensive, but is this increase normal?" If you're focusing only on the currency, the context of the situation might be lacking.

Rather than understanding the foreign currency-rent issue, are you just comfortable saying "you handle it"? It's more like a senseless stubbornness than a shift of responsibility, I mean. They don't have to solve the rent increase with the landlord; maybe they need to solve it internally.

It seems like there's a bit of a tendency to leave things in limbo. Is he trying to buy time with the "I don't understand" line, or is it just a delaying tactic? I mean, is there really a search for a solution, or is he just leaving the work to you? This distinction is important.

Maybe saying "I don't understand" is a defense mechanism for him. Is he afraid that if he accepts the rent increase, he will have to seriously reorganize his budget? Perhaps the issue isn't entirely economic; he's experiencing psychological resistance. Is he ready to deal with this? We need to have a conversation to draw out what he really thinks.

Can you currently keep this increase balanced with your own salary/payment process? Because if their lack of understanding or choice not to understand is forcing you to take on more than your share, you need to first check if there's an issue with that balance. If you're carrying extra weight, this goes beyond just a roommate issue.

Does your roommate have a doubt about whether this increase is due to the landlords' greed or if it genuinely stems from rising costs? Or are they in a completely "it doesn’t affect me" mindset? Maybe they're just talking nonsense because they can't agree on something.

Have you spoken to the landlord about any chances for a discount or deferral? If there's already no room for flexibility, it's not your roommate saying "I don't understand" that is the problem, but rather how you have failed to come up with a solution together. Encourage them to stop being stubborn and focus on making a concrete plan.

If they're saying "I don't understand" and stepping aside, there's evasion involved. Even if they don't grasp the currency, they know the math; it's not hard to understand what comes out of their pocket when the rent increases. If they're not willing to engage in the conversation and move towards a solution, ask them directly what they're bringing to the table.

Is he putting you in a position of stalling instead of contributing, saying "I don't understand"? If he keeps leaving you in constant uncertainty, I think you should discuss the new budget plan openly and clarify his contribution. Bring it to the table by saying, "There's such an increase, what are we doing?" so there’s no place to escape.

How long has the phrase "I don't understand" been going around? Is it really a sudden situation that doesn't give any room for thought, or has this attitude always been present? Because if the same reaction is constant, we have to assume that the person no longer wants to understand.

Could talking to the landlord for someone who says "I don't understand," learning the details of the increase request, and perhaps really uncovering the background of this issue be a solution? In other words, we just brush off the currency increase, but maybe there's more to it. If your roommate doesn’t want information, you investigate, then let’s see what they say. Is it an excuse, empty talk, or is there an actual intent?

Your roommate might be indirectly saying "I don't want to accept this increase in responsibility" when they say "I don't understand". Because beyond understanding, there is taking action. The real issue could be why they don't want to take action. It's necessary to clarify where this comes from, focusing more on "why are they resisting" rather than "what is the reason for the increase."

While probing the reason behind "I don't understand," it’s also worth considering this: Could this person already be experiencing an economic struggle and not able to express it openly? For some, saying "I don't know, I don't understand" is actually an easier way to say "I can't cope with this burden." Have you ever talked about this directly?

Is what she means by "I don't understand" that she can't grasp the impact of the currency, or is it why she should share the burden with you while the rent is increasing? If it's the latter, then there really isn't any roommate relationship left.

"I don't understand," could someone who says this really not understand currency, mathematics, or burden sharing? I mean, if they can't grasp something so fundamental, do they react the same way to the other burdens of life? Or are they just sulking to make you do the work and escape their own responsibilities? If it's the latter, I think you should look directly at the crossroads, because dealing with this mindset is tough.

Has anyone ever asked a person who says "I don't understand," "well, what do you think you should do?" Because even if they don't understand, shouldn't they propose a solution or offer an idea? Even in household chores, you can't avoid washing the dishes just because you say you don't understand how to do it; otherwise, you can't avoid having no work done at all.

"I don't understand," is what they're saying about whether it's really the increase in foreign currency, rent, or if you're telling them that they need to take on more responsibility? Maybe it's not the issue; they just don't want to understand you. Have you been the one holding things together from the start? Directly ask them, "Why am I trying to solve this? You need to contribute as well."

If there’s a model of avoiding responsibility by saying "I don’t understand," how will accountability be shared? And here's another thing: let’s say you refuse to accept it, how much can you handle on your own? Because sometimes the issue is not so much their inaction, but rather you overloading yourself because of them. Is there a Plan B?

Maybe instead of "I don't understand," it's "I don't want to accept it," or even "I don't care"? Could it be that they're not even considering the depth of the currency, the rent? For some people, it's not about the size of the numbers, but how they reflect in their lives; they won't understand until they feel that impact. So how much did you make him feel this situation concretely?

I will ask an independent question from the currency exchange, rent increase, and load sharing: Is this "I don't understand" reaction present in other topics as well? Is it specific only to this issue, or is it a general "not caring" state? Because if there is already a fundamental cycle of indifference, trying to explain it with currency may not be beneficial.

Well, have you ever thought of it this way: Maybe by saying "I don't understand," they're actually passing the ball to you, waiting for you to find a solution? In other words, could it be that they're reluctant to make a decision themselves, putting you in a natural leader position? If so, this situation has shifted into a dynamic that's quite different from just being roommates.

Could it be that when someone says "I don't understand," they are not really making an effort? I mean, they might be looking but not seeing, and if they aren't even trying to engage in understanding, that's already a form of passive-aggressive resistance. Is this attitude about not solving the issue, but rather about stalling you?

When someone closes the topic by saying "I don’t understand," is it because they truly don’t understand, or because it doesn’t suit them? I think we need to pull the question here. Because sometimes people see the solution as so simple and clear that they just say "I don’t understand" and move on because they don’t want to bother. It could also be a subtle way of passing the job onto you. Do you notice this attitude in other situations as well?

Did you give a concrete example to someone who cuts off with "I don't understand"? I mean, did you put a clear table like "this much is missing, this much is too much, this much contribution is needed"? Sometimes people only grasp the situation when they see arithmetic, not abstract concepts.

Someone who says "I don't understand" — is that person really willing to understand or not? That's the first thing to figure out. And even if there is willingness, do they have the capacity? Some people take a step back not because they are confused, but because their problem-solving skills are weak. So, is this a case of shirking responsibility due to inadequacy? It seems like this won't be resolved without a bit of effort.

Now there's something unclear about this "I don't understand" issue: Is it that they truly can't grasp these economic matters or is it a conscious "strategy"? Because if a person behaves like this all the time, it might not be that they can't do it, but rather that they find it inconvenient. Or maybe, instead of cutting back on their own expenses, they find it easier to manage you? Have they ever expressed this in any way, like saying, "I can't do this either"? They should clarify things first.

Maybe they want to completely shift the responsibility onto you by saying "I don't understand"? I mean, these situations could sometimes come not as an excuse, but entirely from a habit. Is the burden of the household arrangement always on your shoulders, is it the same in other matters too?

They may have gotten used to avoiding situations by saying "I don’t understand," but perhaps they are deliberately rejecting thinking about pressing issues like the economic crisis, etc. Not everyone takes on these kinds of responsibilities and tries to solve them; some people just close their eyes. Do you see this as "being comfortable" or as "avoiding stress"? Because one is about comfort, while the other is a completely different state of anxiety.

Consider when and in what context this expression of "I don't understand" is used. Is it only in matters of money, or is it also the case in generally challenging situations? Because this might reflect a general attitude towards dealing with difficult things rather than just a reluctance to resolve an issue.

Maybe it's not a matter of saying "I don't understand" and withdrawing to the corner, but more about not liking your approach to the solution? Perhaps it's not confusion at all; maybe they don’t want to solve it the way you suggested and that's the stance they're taking? Have you ever asked if they have a solution in mind? Or is it solely your calculations that are being discussed at the table?

Let me ask this as well: "I don’t understand," they said, but are they trying to come up with ideas afterward? Or are they just standing there and throwing the ball back to you? Because not understanding is fine, but not even trying to understand is a problem. At the very least, there should be a question like "Is it like this or like that?" Otherwise, it comes off as a passive-aggressive attitude.

I'll ask something else: Does this "I don't understand" response come because they are stuck, or is it to say right from the beginning "I don't want to get involved in this"? Because if it's the second possibility, no matter how much effort you put in, nothing will come out other than a burden left to you. In that case, there's no need to put numbers, as there is no counterpart anyway.

At some point, we need to consider this: Could it be that they truly don't know? After all, everyone's level of economic literacy is different. If you're simplifying and explaining things you know, but they still don't understand, then you might move on to the intention part. But the first step is to clarify whether they actually know or not. Jumping to assume "strategy" from the beginning seems like a shortcut, doesn't it?

Sure, but isn't there a limit to what you call "not really knowing"? I mean, rent, currency increases, etc. are at the heart of the agenda; everyone going to the market is aware of it. Let's say they don't understand this, then what's your reaction to your explanations? Is it just continuing with the same ease despite not understanding anything, or is there at least a question of "What can we do?"

Maybe what he means by "I don't understand" is not the mathematics of the situation, but rather his inability to bear the weight of the issue? In other words, could it be a withdrawal related to the magnitude of what needs to be resolved rather than the act of solving the problem itself? If he reacts the same way even when faced with a clear picture like "Look, there has been this much of an increase, there is this much of a difference," it seems like there is an emotional barrier in play.

But are you blowing this "I don't understand" issue out of proportion? Maybe they really don’t care at all. I mean, economic literacy, emotional barriers and all that are nice, but there could also be plain indifference like "Why should I bother?" It's pointless to develop tactics without knowing this. Just ask openly, is it not knowing the issue or is it indifference?

Perhaps we should not focus on the "I don't understand" part, but rather look at when they react. Is it only when money is being discussed, or do they show the same ease in other matters as well? Because if this is a consistent pattern, the issue might not be understanding or resolving problems, but rather a general avoidance.

I think it would be insufficient to only address the issue of "I don't understand" in relation to currency. This person might be avoiding the general topic of "fulfilling their share." For example, are there the same reactions regarding other expenses, household chores, etc.? Is there a fundamental lack of responsibility perception here? That's what needs to be examined.

I don't think it's very productive to get so caught up on the "I don't understand" part. Whatever the issue is, in the end, you have to share a solution. If you can't do that, whether it's out of ignorance or indifference, it's clear that the burden will always be on you. A more fundamental question: How far will this system take you?

But have you ever thought like this: Could it be that by saying "I don't understand," they are excluding you from the discussion? I mean, they're ending the matter right there without even moving on to the problem-solving part. Is such a passive stance actually an active resistance?

If someone says "I don't understand" with the intention of shutting down the discussion, what do you think could be the source of that intention? For example, are they trying to completely avoid conflict, or is there a power dynamics game at play here, like trivializing your economic plans? Because the tactic of passivity is not always just an escape; it can carry another message behind it.

But doesn't even the passive strategy eventually backfire somewhere? I mean, let’s say they escape by saying "I don't understand," but if the increase in currency is squeezing them, it must be squeezing them as well. How long can this comfort last? Maybe it's truly a matter of not understanding and keeping their eyes closed until something changes. But when that change comes, what will they do?

Maybe they are trying to minimize the seriousness of the situation by saying "I don't understand," as a way to cope with their own anxiety. But how does that help you relax? If they aren't going to share the same stress with you, what kind of cooperation are you expecting on the shared solution part?

Saying "I don’t understand" and stepping back from the issue can be a kind of strategy, but I think the problem is not just about individual comfort; it's a matter of an underlying division of labor. This attitude also determines who is responsible for solving the problem. Just because the rise in foreign currency affects your pocket, it doesn't mean that the solution should automatically be treated as solely your responsibility. This actually places a class-based "invisible work" burden on you. The question is: why is the task of finding solutions left to you instead of sharing the burden?

I had a similar experience with my roommate, not with rent but with grocery shopping. He would say, "You're the one who knows what we need," and would avoid paying. I wonder if this is just an excuse of "you understand better, you do it" or if he genuinely doesn’t want to take responsibility when it comes to money.