The recent currency increase affected the rent, my roommate doesn't understand

While trying to resolve the "I don't understand" part, how transparent you were with him during the rent increase period could also be a factor. For example, how much did you question the rent increase, did you negotiate, or did you inform him during this process? Perhaps "I don't understand" reflects a feeling of being sidelined in some way. It may not just be an economic issue, but also a lack of communication.

When someone says "I don't understand," is it really a lack of information, or are they using this sentence as a form of passive resistance? That's what we need to focus on. Let's set aside the currency issue; if there's such an attitude towards something that directly impacts your pocket, like rent increases, then I believe there won't be much trust in the sharing of general expenses either. Has anything similar happened before? A situation like "you handle this too"?

It's a bit too lax to just say "I don't understand" and try to escape from the situation. Have you ever tried pressing them with, "Well, then who understands, should we ask?" Let's see if they really care about understanding or if they're just trying to dodge the issue.

So, besides talking about the rent increase with this "I don't understand" attitude, does he take on any other responsibilities around the house? Or is he someone who generally leaves the burden of things to you? Even if "I don't understand" is only limited to the issue of the increase, it would still be hard to find a solution without looking at how equally he participates in things.

When delving into the "I don't understand" part, how you present your arguments regarding the period of change can also be effective. For instance, did you mention that it stems from foreign exchange, and if so, did you use concrete examples while explaining this? Because sometimes people can get caught up in questioning why we don't question something rather than focusing on the economic aspect of the issue. If it's that simple, it seems like it could be convincingly addressed with logic.

The currency issue and the rent increase are fine, but the real question is: Is this guy paying the difference? Or does he just say "I don't understand" and not reach for his wallet? Because even if there's something beneath "I don't understand," the answer "I'm not paying" might also be possible.

I think someone saying "I don't understand" might not be criticizing the effect of currency fluctuations on rent increases, but rather your acceptance of this situation. It might be a feeling of "Why did we accept this so easily, why didn't we resist?" But instead of saying that, they resort to a passive "I don't understand." Haven't you ever directly asked, "Well, what would you suggest?" Perhaps there is a lack of trust in a plan.

This "I don’t understand" feels a bit like avoidance, but not a pure escape. Maybe it’s a completely opposing attitude towards the increase, rather than the way it is managed. It might be more of a feeling of being stuck, asking, "Why has it increased, why are we accepting this?" Have you ever sat down and broken down the expenses item by item? Perhaps there’s a picture they haven’t seen.

This "I don't understand" attitude is somewhat like the "who said it matters" issue. Does this person see you as someone who can resolve things, or are they trying to establish authority over your decisions? Perhaps it’s an indirect way of saying "I didn't accept this." Stop talking about the costs; it's essential to clarify their position regarding the rent-setting process. Have they had a say in this from the beginning?

Amid all this, are you not placing too much meaning on this "I don’t understand" story and overlooking a simple laziness? Are they really questioning the currency, the rent increase, the process, etc., or are they just thinking, "Oh man, here comes another discussion"? Because sometimes there is no deep subtext; they are just outright bored of dealing with it. Are they still paying their share?

So, what kind of response does this person give after saying "I don’t understand" to the solution you suggested? Because even if they don't want to go back and talk about the same topic, how they react when you present an option to them is, in my opinion, an important signal. Is it just a refusal, or is there a clear disinterest?

So they just say "I don’t understand" and move on, and then they have no suggestions of their own, right? What is it to react this much and take zero responsibility? Just straightforwardly ask "What do you want then?" and see if they can evade that.

Someone who says "I don’t understand" may not even be in a position to criticize the increase. Maybe they're just trying to take the easy way out and leave you in the managerial position. Did you unknowingly give a sign that you'd take on the entire burden? Because the guy might think to himself, "This isn't my problem."

Isn't this friend's "I don't understand" directly about people like us rather than about foreign currency or something? For instance, could it be an internal questioning like "why are you so aware and accepting of this?" Have you really clarified what they mean by "I don't understand"? Because sometimes such indirect comments can blow up for no reason.

But does she close the topic after saying "I don't understand," or does she continuously bring up new discussions within the same cycle? Because each time saying "why did this happen" and starting over without doing anything can be a bit manipulative. It seems like she is trying to completely evade her own responsibilities.

Saying "I don't understand" to get away with it is one thing, but is this person neglecting to cover their own expenses? Because if they're still paying, why are you taking on the part that belongs to them? I think the main issue here is that you've completely taken on the management of the situation and you're annoyed with their ease. This excuse of "I don't understand" might actually be rooted in that.

Or is there a lack of belief within this "I don't understand"? You know, some people camouflage their inability to follow a topic by saying "I don't understand," implying they don't trust the accuracy of the topic. Have you ever thought about whether this person really trusts you in this regard?

If instead of "I don't understand," they had said "I don't care," you would actually be in a more honest place right now. Because if someone who has never dealt with such detailed agendas is remaining frustratingly indifferent, the issue is not understanding but clearly not bothering to think. Are you really annoyed by their ease, or are you feeling cramped because you feel like you're carrying this process alone? I think you should clarify.

I have a question related to someone who just dismisses the topic by saying, "I don’t understand": Does this person see you as an equal partner, or do they view you as some sort of organizer/expense manager? Because sometimes the phrase "I don’t understand" is actually a polite way of saying, "I don’t have the energy/capacity to deal with this issue, you handle it." Have you tried speaking clearly and telling them that you won’t accept being pushed into that role?

If he keeps saying "I don’t understand," at some point, you have to accept that he doesn't really care about understanding. If you keep explaining the same things over and over, it may have transformed from his "not understanding" into your continuous effort. At some point, it might be more effective to cut off the conversation by saying, "If you don’t understand, then I’m not explaining it anymore."

I think it would be more educational for someone who says "I don't understand" to face the consequences of their misunderstanding. For example, if they can't relate the rent to currency exchange rates, instead of explaining why they need to pay more for the increase, try reflecting it directly on the bill. Then, whatever they don't understand will become clear there.

So, is there any change in the spending or habits of the one who says "I don't understand"? For example, are they still living as comfortably, or are they indifferent even though a situation has been created that would make them feel the seriousness of the matter? Because some people only "understand" when it directly affects them.

If they don't understand the increase in rent due to foreign currency, could they also be confused about the rise in general expenses? I mean, does this person also show the same blind indifference when it comes to grocery bills or services that have increased prices? If they aren't raising hell about that, they might be uncomfortable with how you're bringing the issue to the table. It seems like there’s a hint of avoiding responsibility.

Perhaps the main issue is how you’re trying to explain the increase in rent with foreign currency. If most people can't make that connection, the reason isn't that they don't understand the concept of currency, but rather that the practical implications of this remain unclear in their lives. Do you always speak in economic terms, or do you explain it in a more results-focused way like "we will need to pay this much more"? Sometimes, direct, clear figures can be more effective than theory for understanding.

I'm sorry, but this "I don't understand" excuse seems just like a trick to avoid collaboration. If there is really any effort, they could figure out the exchange-rent connection on Google in two minutes. On the contrary, they might have unconsciously gotten used to your organizing role a bit. Have you ever tried saying, "Let’s find a solution together" and passing the ball to them? Let's see what they will do then.

I think too much meaning is being attached here to someone who says "I don't understand." They either truly don't care or can't see the indirect effects of what they're saying. Just say something straightforward like "this is how much the price has increased, this much difference is needed," and see, maybe you're explaining in too scattered a way.

I'm not sure if there needs to be this much tolerance regarding "not understanding." Because not understanding is also a choice. If they can't establish a logical connection, don't they have access to the internet, social media, or their surroundings? Are they completely unaware of current events? Maybe the issue is more about them choosing the comfort of not having this discussion with you than about currency exchange. What would happen if they didn't withdraw? Would it be too much to think, or at least put in a little effort?

If there's such an emphasis on "I don't understand," maybe you're not really discussing how the increase will affect their budget, rather than the economic side. For instance, do they think they need to change their spending habits after the raise? Or do they just expect you to somehow cover the additional costs? I think you should ask them directly.

Are you perhaps discussing not the rate of increase, but why we have come to a period of increased payments with someone who says, "I don't understand"? In other words, it might be more concrete to give examples based on how the process reflects on the landlord rather than the effect of currency fluctuations on rent increases. Connections can also be made through the landlord's own expenses or expectations.

Have you ever tried to make someone who says "I don't understand" think about future risks after a raise? For example, saying, "if we can't afford this increase now, we'll have to deal with moving expenses." Sometimes people react more quickly to potential bigger problems rather than current issues.

If they're saying "I don’t understand," maybe they don’t want to face their part of the responsibility in this matter. Share directly, "this is affecting your budget by this much, so I will be affected like this too," and see if a solution proposal comes up. Because if "not understanding" is a refuge, don't expect a clear result without coming out of it.

You don't actually have to explain the connection between rent and currency to someone who says, "I don't understand." If the outcome won't change anyway, just say, "This is the amount of increase, and this is how much we will share the difference" and leave it at that. The longer the discussion goes on, the more excuses you'll hear.

I think there's an excessive amount of analysis on the phrase "I don’t understand." So how does this person manage their monthly expenses? How do they calculate their bills? If they’re saying "I don’t understand" there too, then there’s no ground to discuss the seriousness of the matter. But if they’re managing everything else smoothly and saying "I don’t understand" here, they might be taking the easy way out.

If someone who functions smoothly in other areas attributes this to "I don't understand," perhaps they don't find it that important. They might be thinking, "I’ll pay a few more pennies, I'll cut back from somewhere else if necessary." For example, you need to clarify directly with "Is this it, or not?" as it seems to get muddled.

If they're saying they don't understand, maybe it's just how they're dealing with things. But the real question is this: How did this person react in the past regarding other issues like rent increases, home organization, shared expenses? Is this their first time acting this way? If this is something new, then blaming it on the exchange rate or something else might just be a cover-up for some other discomfort. You can't resolve it without being open about it.

So does this person approach other shared expenses like this, apart from the rent increase? For example, if they also say "I don't understand" regarding grocery shopping, then it implies there is a problem with cohabitation. If it's only about the rent, perhaps they are uncomfortable about something in terms of sharing with you?

If Kira's attitude towards other expenses is normal, then the issue may not be about the rent increase but rather about the overall burden of the rent payment. In other words, they might be thinking, "I'm already paying this much, I can't handle an increase either." If that's the case, could the solution be to have a more direct conversation linked to their budget?

But when they say "I don't understand," are they only questioning the monetary aspect, or are they questioning the increase itself? In other words, putting aside the connection to foreign currency, maybe this person is completely focused on the part of "why is it increasing so much, is this fair?" If that's the case, you might not meet in everyday economic logic; there is something more fundamental.

A person who says "I don't understand" and avoids paying rent may not need to explain their situation in terms of budget or fairness. Perhaps clarifying the matter doesn't suit them because they benefit from the current uncertainty. In other words, they might not want to take on the responsibility of sharing openly with you. So, corner them a bit by asking directly, "Are you going to pay this much, or not?"

This "I don’t understand" issue might be testing you. It could be trying to gauge your determination. This kind of power play happens among roommates. If you don’t set a clear stance once, they might see you as the soft spot in every subsequent argument. If it’s a test, don’t fall for it.

You might be right when you say they aren't interested in it, but there's another possibility: they might truly be someone who doesn’t understand money or budgeting at all. That is, some people may never have really thought about it or experienced maintaining a regular income-expense account. If that's the case, it might be necessary to sit down together and do some calculations once. Telling someone who doesn't understand to "understand" isn’t the solution.

There’s also this: When someone says "I don’t understand," are they actually saying they don’t understand you, or that they don’t understand the situation? In other words, are they unable to figure out why you’re so upset, or do they really not get the logic behind the increase? If it’s the former, the issue might be perceived as a bit personal, so choose your words accordingly.

Perhaps the reason why he just brushes it off by saying "I don't understand" is that he's questioning your economic motivation. In other words, could your emphasis on the increase have created a perception in his eyes that you're too focused on money? If he finds your perspective a bit exaggerated, he might just be adopting a reflexive attitude.

In the phrase "I don't understand," we need to pause for a moment and consider the power dynamics at play here. If not "understanding" a rent increase due to currency fluctuations calls into question a very basic economic obligation – the duty to pay rent – this could entirely reflect a clash of class positions. In other words, is this person at an income level that cannot afford the increase, or are they adopting this stance to shift the responsibility onto you despite being able to pay? If it’s the latter, it actually creates an unseen workload for you. Perhaps it is also necessary to discuss not just the money, but the balance of equality in this relationship. How much do you value each other's labor?

Isn't it a bit of a stretch to load the word "I don't understand" with so much meaning? Maybe it's simply saying "I don't want to accept it." Besides, when you start talking about currency, class conflict, and so on, the other side doesn't seem to care. Just get straight to the numbers. Say, "This will increase by this much, you'll pay this much," and let the matter end.

You say "they avoid it by saying they don’t understand," but have you ever responded with a question like "if the rent doesn’t increase, will we continue to rent this house?" If our only concern is money, we might try to do a situation assessment. But if they are completely closed off to the persuasion process, the real issue might be how solid this shared living bond is.

Does this "I don't understand" issue seem to you a bit like a tactic for avoiding responsibility? You know, like those people who behave as they please as long as you don't confront them directly. I wonder how meticulous you are about your other expenses and habits, can you control them? Maybe they are relaxing elsewhere while putting a strain on this.

If your roommate says they "don’t understand" the rent increase, maybe you can try organizing a general budget instead of discussing the increases directly. For instance, you could bring up other shared expenses like electricity, water, and internet. Generally, people tend to resist more when the topic is just rent, but when they see the total burden, the bigger picture might convince them a bit more. Let’s see if this method creates a clearer dialogue!

When you say "I don't understand," perhaps you're finding the increase arbitrary. Did you provide any additional explanation? For example, did you specify "This exchange rate, this rental interest rate, this general market" to make it concrete? Because some people think that the price hikes are baseless and get into the mindset of "the landlord is making things up."

"I don't understand" — could there be another emotion at that moment? For example, tension, boredom, embarrassment? Maybe it's not about not understanding the topic, but rather related to the capacity to keep the conversation going. What does he/she do when silent, is he/she distracted by the phone or something?

The issue of "I don't understand" has been discussed a lot, but how does your roommate view these kinds of relationships? Is that clear? Has he ever shared such financial responsibilities with someone else or handled them on his own? Maybe he's even quite unfamiliar with the simplest economic dialogues. It's worth doing a check from the start.

Did you receive the landlord's request for a rent increase in writing? Because this increase could be bordering on illegal in some places. If the situation exceeds the limit, perhaps your roommate might have sensed that there is no legal basis while saying "I don’t understand."

If your roommate says they "don't understand" this rent increase, maybe there's something to consider: Is the landlord's increase limited to their own demands, or have comparable rents in the area also increased at the same rate? Because if you're just talking based on the landlord's perspective, it might be perceived as a fabricated number. Have you thought about checking rental listings in the area and bringing concrete examples?

If they're saying "I don't understand" this much, maybe there's something they really can't wrap their head around but can't express it. Could there be an imbalance in the general division of household chores or something? I mean, it makes me think that they might be using the rent increase as an excuse to not express some other discomfort. Have a little talk about it.

If your roommate is saying "I don't understand," maybe they really just don't want to understand. Forget about the raises; you might be doing shared meals, cleaning, and so on; how's that going? If you're constantly running low on detergent, it could also be an attempt to avoid responsibility. I think you should consider their general attitude.

If they are ignoring the currency increase or playing the "I don’t understand" card, just ask them directly: "If this increase is so unreasonable, how would you solve it if you were in charge?" Let's see them come up with a solution.

But the issue is this: Could your roommate be implying that they can't accept this increase and are thinking about moving? In such a case, it seems more logical that it's not about not understanding, but rather their tendency to leave you with this burden alone. I think you should just ask directly, something like, "Is the rent increase putting pressure on you? Are you making any other plans?" Just to clarify.

If they say "I don't understand," it could also mean this: There may be another deficit in their budget, so they might be showing resistance not because of the rent increase, but because they're unable to cover their overall financial situation. For example, have you noticed any changes in their spending or income recently? They might be trying to project their financial troubles onto you.

Just let it go, if they say "I don't understand" they should sit down and ask about what they don't understand. You are taking care of all external factors and your own responsibilities, but they are still in passive mode. They are either wasting time or just too lazy to think. Take out the calculator, put it in front of them, and show everything concretely. Let's see what they will say.

If your roommate is aware of the overall pace of rent increases, it's suspicious for them to say "I don't understand". Are they really detached from the market, or is this "I don't understand" actually a "I don't want to understand" reaction? Because it's easy to accuse one side of misunderstanding, but in such a sensitive matter, a person should also question their own communication style. Did you speak too sharply and condescendingly while explaining, that's also a possibility.

This "I don't understand" part feels like a bit of a time-wasting tactic to me. Maybe they don't accept the increase, but they also can't figure out where to cut back. Without dragging it out any longer, just tell me straight: will they recover or not?

If they say "I don't understand" and just wait without doing anything, they might be silently expecting a solution or sacrifice from you. But this is not how this works. Unless they ask clearly, keep proceeding with the figures as usual; they will have to adapt.

"What he means by not understanding is whether it’s really about currency, or why the increase in rent is so high? Because some people resist the outcome when they don’t understand the reasons. Clarify the reasons; maybe he hasn’t fully learned why the price increase is inevitable. But if the issue is simply about being 'expensive,' then it opens up a discussion for another perspective.

This "I don't understand" statement can sometimes reflect not confusion, but rather an attitude of "I don't find this increase justified." It seems to shift directly from the topic of currency or the market to what you are or aren’t willing to accept in your rent. It should clearly set its own limits, and then you can plan accordingly.

This "I don't understand" response feels to me a bit like trying to avoid discussing the details and stepping away from the current agenda. Perhaps they're also trying to dodge other responsibilities at home; we've only focused on the rent issue, but I suggest you take a look at the general responsibility sharing as well. Is the division of labor fair, or has the burden of something already been shifted onto you?

If they seem unable to pay their own rent or take on their responsibilities, what was their plan when moving in with you? I mean, did someone who now says "I don't understand" not do any calculations about where this was headed from the start? Or did things just go south later on? Someone who initially came without a plan, are they now caught up in the numbers?

When you were leaving, did you discuss any variables such as currency increases or rent hikes while making the agreement? Or did everyone just enter with a theme of "this much a month" based on their own budget from the get-go? Because from what I understand, it seems there hasn't been any discussion regarding the flexibility of how rent increases would be shared among you. Now this "I don't understand" reaction might actually stem from that initial conversation that never took place.

"I don't understand" feels like a bit of a passive-aggressive response to me. I mean, if they're not going to meet the standard, they might be leaving the issue vague instead of stating it directly. Think of it as a clearer test: "This part of the rent increased for this reason, what do you say about that?" Throw the ball to them with a straightforward question and see if they really don't understand, or if they just don't want to deal with it.

I don't understand, let's skip that. What kind of solution do you expect regarding the rent increase? I mean, even if he resists this increase, there’s still something that affects your rent burden. Have you made him feel this? If you say, "You don't understand, but this affects my budget this much, what's your solution plan?" he might feel cornered. Maybe something will come out of that.

I get that you don't understand, but have you thought about whether they have a responsibility to offer a solution? If it wasn't discussed from the beginning how to address these increases, then expecting a suggestion from you now wouldn't be that strange. Are you just informing us, or are you looking for a compromise? That's not clear.

I won't even mention that they say they don’t understand, but do they want to live with this rent increase or not? Are they not willing to compromise, or do they not care about staying at home? I think you should ask a bit more directly, there's no need to beat around the bush.

When you say "I don't understand," it’s actually important to clarify whether you're confused about the amount of money, the reason, or how you will share this burden. Because each one requires a different solution. Just ask directly, "What don't you understand? Can you clarify?" to avoid any confusion.

This "I don't understand" issue seems to be one that we could talk about more, but there's another thing on my mind: did this start when the rent increased, or had they been brushing off little things before then? Because this situation isn't just about rent; it could be a general tendency to "avoid responsibility." If they have had this attitude from the beginning, you need to open your eyes regardless of the rent.

Everyone is fixated on him saying, "I don't understand", but another detail caught my attention: Is this person saying "I don't understand" because he doesn't want to pay the rent increase, or is it that he really is stuck in his household budget? If there has been a recent change in income, the phrase "I don't understand" could be entirely a defense mechanism. If there is a financial squeeze and he hasn't openly discussed it, the situation looks different. I suggest you consider whether you need to revert to your own circumstances a bit.

Do you take the phrase "I don't understand" as a bit of a reaction against you? I mean, there is a raise like this, and a solution is needed, but instead, it creates a breakdown in communication. Did you directly tell him how you felt after this remark? Maybe the topic has shifted from the raise to the dynamics between you.

Maybe what he means by "I don't understand" isn't just the mathematical part of the situation, but the responsibility or approach you’re asking from him. So, time has come, sure, but could he be feeling stuck about exactly what he needs to do in this situation? Sometimes people shy away from the pressure of solutions more than solutions themselves. Instead of asking him, "What do you suggest?" you might try going with something more open-ended like, "What might make it easier to act in this situation?"

Could the phrase "I don't understand" be stretching over time? I mean, is it a reaction when time is first mentioned, then a defense, and now a method of procrastination? Because if you still haven't clarified what you actually understand or don't understand, it might have entered a continuous loop. Have you been stuck in the same place from the beginning, or is the topic shifting?

Maybe he can't admit that he doesn't take the issue of the raise as seriously when he says, "I don’t understand." I mean, is he trying to distract you from the topic instead of taking responsibility? Because it seems a bit strange that he wouldn't really understand, especially with the raise rate being such a hot topic.

Maybe they're testing you by saying "I don't understand." So, will you advance the issue, apply pressure, or will you give up? Sometimes a person deliberately avoids stepping in, waiting to see how the other side will move. That's why, if too much time passes without a clear response, things can really get shaky.

Maybe he's trying to relinquish control by saying "I don't understand." In other words, he may prefer to remain in a passive position rather than finding a solution. In such a case, wouldn't it be better to draw a clear line of partnership by saying, "I'm paying this much, your share is this much, what are we doing?"

"I don't understand" might not be just a complete avoidance, but perhaps they are running away from something bigger than discussing the responsibility of the raise. For example, they might not grasp how much you are emphasizing this, how important it is to you, or perhaps they see your stance as "pressure." So, it seems there is resistance not just to the raise, but also to your approach. If they still say they don't understand in such a clear position, maybe they are avoiding coming to an agreement on a solution. Well, was there ever a moment when the solution was discussed but not accepted?

In my opinion, putting so much depth into the phrase "I don’t understand" is a bit much. It’s quite simple; a raise is being talked about, the share is clear, and what needs to be paid is also clear. Not understanding the raise is silly; they might not understand the payment part. Just ask directly, "Are you going to cover this rent increase or not?" If they are avoiding the solution, they are probably being difficult.

I think the phrase "I don’t understand" might be a delaying tactic to completely avoid the solution, but on the other hand, if you're reacting so directly, could your reservations be weighing you down? Maybe instead of discussing this solely from a mathematical standpoint, you need to clearly express that you have no expectations from them and just want a fair distribution. Sometimes people are not looking for a solution; they are just trying to fend off pressure.

The part about "I don’t understand" is fine, but for how long has he not understood? I mean, if this has been going on for more than a month, it’s not that he doesn’t understand anymore; it means he doesn’t want to understand. You should just say, "Look, brother, there’s this much difference, what do you say?" and wait for an answer. If it's still not clear, he’s brushing it off; it’s that simple.

Maybe it’s resisting your new role distribution in rental more than the financial aspect of the job. In other words, the perception of "leadership" or "bossiness" could have formed alongside the raise. Do you think the dynamic of this conversation is entirely about sharing, or has it become a bit of a power balance discussion?

Maybe it's not that they don't understand, but that they don't want to understand, and the reason might not be money but something else. For instance, do they not want to take the risk of moving, or are they hesitant about how your relationship dynamic will change? Because sometimes the main issue isn't money, but the fear of disrupting the order.

Is she keeping her budget secret when she says "I don't understand"? Maybe she's not saying or showing how much she's struggling. If you directly ask, "Is your financial situation suitable to cover this difference?" will she open up a bit?

"I don't understand" could hint at a situation that might not actually be related to the raise. For example, is there an insecurity between you aside from the sharing responsibility? Have you tried asking him directly to explain in detail "what exactly he doesn't understand"?

"I don't understand," he says, but do you pull away afterward? I mean, are you really expecting an explanation to come after this sentence, or do you just stop the discussion and walk away upon hearing that phrase? Maybe your attitude is what's ending the conversation.

If they say they don't understand, ask, "Okay, what don't you understand?" to request details. Because either you don't really care about what they said, or they like to use that phrase as a smokescreen. Someone needs to clarify here; otherwise, the conversation will end up being a blind fight.

"I don't understand" is it a way to stall or is it really a lack of understanding? The way to figure this out is: Has there ever been a serious discussion about price changes? Or is this a process that runs on vague hints and expectations? Because let's say you didn't provide a clear picture at all, then it’s still possible not to understand.

If they say "I don't understand," it might be that they really don't have the energy or desire to continue the conversation at that moment. So you might be expecting a clear explanation, but their mind might be distracted or focused on something else at that time. Are you bringing up this conversation every single time?

Maybe they don't want to accept the rent increase but can't say it outright? So saying "I don't understand" could be a way of denying the situation. Ask it from such a perspective that it will reveal whether the issue is really about the increase or the psychological resistance aspect. Pay attention to what they say in response.

"I don't understand," they say, but look, maybe they actually don't want to take risks. I mean, the uncertainty of finding a tenant in a new place, the possibility of conditions worsening if you move... Those kinds of things could be involved too. Just directly ask, "Why does this situation bother you?" Let's see what the issue turns out to be.

If they say "I don't understand," it might be because they are not uncomfortable with the issue of money, but they don’t want to discuss it with you. This means that when it comes to budgets, they may be afraid of feeling less equal to you or they may think that discussing it will unnecessarily cool your relationship. If you directly ask, "Why don't you want to bring this up with me?" the reason might not even be about money at all.

Maybe when they hear about a raise, they go on the defensive because they feel unprepared. It might feel like something sudden is coming at them, and they react to it. Do you dive into this topic all of a sudden, or do you give a heads-up first, preparing the ground by saying, "Let's sit down and talk about this matter"?

After saying "I don't understand," does he give any examples related to his own expenses or payment patterns? For instance, does he say something like "I didn't take this into account" or "I wasn't aware of that"? Or is he using this phrase just to wiggle out of a tight spot? I think these two are different.

If "I don't understand" is a refuge, perhaps these price increases mean nothing to them. Have you clearly laid out how much the increase is and how it affects your budget? Because based on that, they might see it as "3-5 doesn't matter," while you might have experienced it from a completely different perspective. Perhaps the first step is that: Are we living in the same world? Let's take a look.

Someone who says "I don't understand" might not have thought at all about what money is? Some people really experience these kinds of things as an abstract concept, meaning that the increase in rent is not a concrete stress for them, but rather a "things like this happen in life" situation. I think it's necessary to question whether you think about it with the same concreteness as they do; otherwise, it means you are not speaking the same language.

Maybe they don't understand the issue of the price increase because they don't want to share the responsibility? Some people can remain passive, viewing the shifting of the burden to another as a natural process in such matters. When they say "I don't understand," are they actually saying "it's not my problem"? I think you should directly ask about their position.